Financial logic you can inspect
Apply explicit calculation rules. Reconcile results to the records and surface exceptions for review
AI agents that connect financial decisions to physical world
Your business context, financial rules, and controls
Built for:
Data centers, Energy, Electric utilities, Water utilities, Construction, Manufacturing · machinery, Manufacturing · equipment, Battery manufacturing, Semiconductor manufacturing, Chemicals & materials, Mining & metals, Oil & gas, Renewable energy, EPC contractors, Energy service companies
Built to handle:
Month-end close, Program-code exceptions, Project margin monitoring, Bid & pricing models, Estimate-to-complete, Change-order costing, Cost allocation, Budget vs. actuals, Accrual preparation, Invoice reconciliation, Capitalization review, Intercompany reconciliation, Vendor coding review, Continuous controls, Audit evidence collection
Cayu FrameworkOpen or Closed Models · Your systems · Your control
Your business, in context
- Financial and operational records
- Contracts, policies, and assumptions
- Reviewed decisions and their sources
Specialized finance agent
Investigate
Calculate
Verify
Your company-specific harnessFinancial logic · Memory · Controls · Connectors · Tools
Work ready for review
- Reconciled calculations
- Proposed corrections and follow-ups
- Evidence your team can inspect
Durable runtime
Progress saved · Waits for input · Resumes where it stopped · Auditable
Close the month
Fix the root-cause
Recurring invoices with no code. Follow Cayu from detection to a lasting vendor fix
$40,000 without a program
Three invoices need program codes before close
American Power Equipment
$40,000Unassigned net charges
3Invoices
| Invoice | Net amount |
|---|---|
| APE-1048 | $18,400 |
| APE-1056 | $12,600 |
| APE-1063 | $9,000 |
July AP ledger · PO-4821
Find the recurring cause
The purchase order has program codes. The vendor’s invoice template leaves them out
Three closes, the same issue
May4 invoicesCorrected
June3 invoicesCorrected
July3 invoicesOpen
PO-4821 lists P104 and P205; the vendor PDFs omit both
A saved rule does the math
Cayu retrieves a controller-approved rule and runs a deterministic calculation
Saved rule · FIN-07 v3
Net amount × share of approved hoursP104: 270 hours · 75% / P205: 90 hours · 25%
| Invoice | P104 | P205 |
|---|---|---|
| APE-1048 | $13,800 | $4,600 |
| APE-1056 | $9,450 | $3,150 |
| APE-1063 | $6,750 | $2,250 |
| Total | $30,000 | $10,000 |
$40,000 allocatedDifference $0
Net charges · Posting requires approval
Your team approves the email
Cayu emails the controller a draft. Nothing goes to the vendor before approval
Vendor email draftAwaiting approval
Please reissue APE-1048, APE-1056, and APE-1063 with P104/P205 codes per the attached allocation
Keep the $40,000 total unchanged and add program codes to future invoice templates
Attached: allocation · PO-4821 · Approved hours
Fix the source issue
Across 24 emails over four days, Cayu follows through without losing context
Vendor follow-up
- Request sent after approval
- Codes clarified; revisions checked
- Invoices and template corrected
$40,000 reconciled · Coding awaits posting approval
The next close starts smarter
Each approved correction gives the next investigation a better starting point
Knowledge that compounds
Already known
FIN-07 v3 and prior coding corrections
Added this time
Verified vendor fix, revised invoices, and approval
Next invoice
Check program codes early; apply the rule to current approved hours
The numbers keep
physical-world story
Six months later, your team can return to the source, the calculation, and the decision
Knowledge with a history
Keep assumptions, corrections, and evidence connected across investigations and projects
Freedom to choose models
Use open or closed models within the same domain-specific harness
Your team stays in control
Review the work, correct the context, and approve consequential actions before they proceed
Schedule a 30-minute discovery call
with a CFO who managed an energy company with $2B in revenue